Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: > Florent Guillaume wrote: > >> >> Hi, I've been abroad the last few days, so couldn't contribute >> earlier to this flamewar ;) > > > :-) > > I am sure that if not Codespeak works out (i.e. it cannot run zope or > whatever) we probably can host things at Chalmers. > > I use Plone, Jean-Marc uses CPS, so we'd be almost "neutral" in that > respect (sorry Martijn, we don't use Silva - yet, at least ;-). > > In any event, I agree with the implied opinion that bootstrapping > should be a quick phase, and that "branding" ECM as vendor neutral is > important. > > So I propose we quickly move on to defining the base requirements that > are needed by the hosting and prioritise them, find out whether > codespeak will satisfy the main requirements or if we need to find > alternatives. > > Cheers, > > /dario > I agree with Florent, the Trac ticket manager is invaluable for communicating and for tracking issues, even if it not perfect. What is then needed is a site to obtain latest updates, not just about the code but about documentation, drafts, ideas, etc. The wiki is not adapted because it easily becomes a navigation mess. Setting up such a facility is a lot of job and a lot of responsibility, so whomever takes that responsibility first should get the credit for it. Anyone who has the ressources is welcome to step forward and provide something better... But if the goal is to get the lowest possible level of service (i.e. svn) just for the sake of preserving neutrality, what's the point? neutrality is the opposite of action. /JM
Hosting: Nuxeo: Zope service provider