Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > > >>Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: >>[snip Trac is invaluable advocacy] >> >>You've been using Trac in production for one (1) week now, right? :) >> > > there was another tracker before Trac: bugzilla and a cvstrac (though > not integrated). I agree an *issue tracker* is invaluable for this project on the long term. We've been running roundup for years now at Infrae. >>>But if the goal is to get the lowest possible level of service (i.e. >>>svn) just for the sake of preserving neutrality, what's the point? >>>neutrality is the opposite of action. >> >>Huh? There's plenty of action on codespeak, isn't there? > I meant that focussing on 'neutrality' is sterile undertaking that > stiffles action, because no one dares make a move... What do you call the z3 base if not a move? :) It was explicitly motivated by neutrality. Anyway, I'm glad you dared to make a move, and you're right that we shouldn't let ourselves drown in discussion and nobody does anything. In this sense this is an ideal situation as we're having the discussion *and* actual stuff is happening. :) Let's see this discussion as about what the next steps should be, not about the move that already happened. I think we should take some steps towards neutrality, as it will help make us all feel comfortable to contribute. As to contribution, I've contributed too much to this discussion already, as I think I'm repeating myself repeatedly. :) I'll assume the steps are going to be taken eventually, and will work on more productive aspects now. Regards, Martijn
Hosting: Nuxeo: Zope service provider